|
Y'all made me re-publish my website for this. Thanks, Dr. César Morales. When Whispers Become Patterns: Questions of Power, Transparency and Accountability at Ventura County Board of Education Yes, this is long. I've worked to consolidate numerous posts I've shared on social media related to this issue to make it more accessible for folks not on Facebook. If you've been keeping up, some of this is what you've already read. Disclaimers:
What follows is an attempt to document patterns of concern that have been raised repeatedly, by multiple people, across multiple contexts — and to ask whether those patterns warrant deeper scrutiny, transparency and independent review as it relates to the Ventura County Office of Education under the leadership of Dr. César Morales. At a certain point, I gotta ask: When do repeated concerns stop being “just rumors?” How We Got Here In the aftermath of the Swalwell fallout, many people asked how “this” happened. Apparently, concerns about his behavior had circulated for years. Rumors. Whispers. Stories people had heard but didn’t act on. And the same question kept surfacing: How did someone climb this high without intervention? How did we let this happen?! The truth is, rumors are hard to act on. That's what has been discussed, call after call. They’re easy to dismiss when there’s no formal complaint, no smoking gun, no neat little package of evidence tied up with a bow. I get it. You weren't "in the room where it happened." Sigh. And frankly, people stay quiet for understandable reasons. They fear retaliation. They fear not being believed. They fear becoming collateral damage. Survivors know their motives will be questioned and their character scrutinized — especially if they’re not viewed as a “perfect victim.” I've been watching it play out in front of me as this story has unfolded — by the same people who performatively clutched their pearls about Swalwell. Crickets now — that, or they're busy participating in smear campaigns. I don't know which is worse, but I do know it's all pretty gross and disheartening. But when the same concerns surface repeatedly — over years, across people, across institutions — eventually it becomes less about isolated allegations and more about patterns, which is what I've really attempted to focus on and identify. This isn't about one or two accounts. Over the last several weeks, I've connected with dozens of folks who have revealed a lot about patterns surrounding Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Dr. César Morales. The sheer volume of stories and responses cannot be overlooked. What started as an effort to better understand allegations of sexual harassment quickly expanded into shared concerns about poor governance, compensation transparency, executive/workplace culture, power dynamics and public accountability at the Ventura County Office of Education, under the leadership of Dr. Morales (although many of these issues didn't necessarily start with just his administration.) Morales isn't a hired employed. He's elected. And when significant power is concentrated within a public institution such as is the structure at VCOE, transparency and oversight become even more important, and worth your attention. The One-Time Payment AllegationsThere are many issues I'll cover, but I'm going start first with the issue that may ultimately matter the most, at least to most people. I already wasn't going to be down with someone who has multiple sexual harassment allegations against him, but maybe that's just meeeee. Several individuals alleged that Morales — and potentially other executive staff — received one-time off-schedule payments or bonuses that were never publicly disclosed or approved through the required board process. Let me break it down for you ... an "undisclosed bonus," y'all ... is what I would consider stealing. We've been delicate here with phrasing but like ... shouldn't we be calling it what it is? If you are giving yourself bonuses without following state law for review and approval, you are ... stealing taxpayer money. Like, we're talking amounts in the $17,000 range. Is that 5% of $315,000? Someone go do the math for me. I don't math. To be clear: I have not independently verified these payments because VCOE has not yet produced the payroll data necessary to confirm or refute the allegations. I submitted a PRA request. To date, they have pushed out any review of the request, only responding after I escalated to the Board of Education trustees. Yeah, they weren't too happy about that. But I want to call your attention to California Education Code §1209, which states that a county superintendent cannot increase their own salary, financial remuneration or benefits without first bringing the matter before the county board of education at a public meeting and obtaining board approval. This isn't just ed code, it's also a part of VCOE's board policies (as it should be.) It's pretty crystal clear. Then, there's Education Code §1302, which similarly requires public discussion of salary or bonus increases exceeding $10,000 thresholds for county office employees. If undisclosed payments occurred outside those procedures, that would represent a serious governance issue, wouldn't you agree? And there is a very simple way to clear this up. Release the payroll records. That’s it. That's all I'm asking for. If the allegations are false, the payroll data should quickly and definitively resolve the issue. Instead, my PRA requests seeking salary schedules, contracts and payroll information have faced delays and extensions. Dr. Morales begged his staff to pray for him because the "devil is after me." And ... he hired a lawyer. Which begs the question: what is Dr. Morales hiding? Asking for transparency should not be treated like a threat. Especially not in a public institution managing billions in educational resources and serving vulnerable student populations.
 The Power Dynamic ProblemOne of the most consistent themes raised in conversations involved repeated workplace relationships that have, and do, carry significant power imbalances — these go as far back as his time as a superintendent for OSD. Several individuals described Morales as engaging in relationships with lower-power staff or women working within education systems he oversaw. Some of these relationships, by many accounts, were described as the “worst kept secrets” within the education community. Nearly everyone I spoke to knew all about these relationships. It's actually pretty staggering how many folks do know about this, and don't know about this, at the same time. To be very clear: I don't care about policing consensual adult relationships or shaming the women involved. I mean if you're an absolute sleaze bag (and I believe he is), I'll totally take that character flaw into account on a personal level when I think about who should be representing our schools ... but I realize that doesn't sway everyone. That's not my focus here. The reality is that workplace relationships involving power imbalance create serious ethical and institutional concerns — especially when they involve public officials overseeing taxpayer-funded organizations. Boop. There's a whole host of questions that arise when considering potential liability tied to a workplace relationship with power imbalance, right?
These become even more significant when considering Morales’ current engagement to VCOE Deputy Superintendent of Fiscal Services Misty Key. The top two County Office of Ed folks are in a relationship ... and their actions each impact each other's compensation! This is wild bananas, folks. At a February 2026 endorsement meeting, Morales reportedly stated that county legal advised there was no conflict so long as he did not directly evaluate Key’s performance (he never produced that legal statement by the way ... and when board trustees expressed concerns — he told them they don't have authority over personnel decisions). Shortly afterward, he promoted an associate superintendent to deputy superintendent of student services — so that Key could be evaluated by someone other than her fiancé. It's pretty much unheard of for deputy superintendents to evaluate one another ... more than that, it's actually highly unusual for a county office of Ventura County's size to have two deputy superintendents (very well compensated positions, mind you). Go us, paying for Dr. Morales' fucked up sex life escapades. For context:
Again, the concern here is not simply shitty, sleazy personal behavior. It is how personal relationships intersect with public authority, executive/cabinet staff structure, compensation and institutional oversight. That's where we see these governance concerns really begin piling up. Compensation, Governance and the Transparency ProblemOver the last several weeks, I reviewed:
WHEW. That was exhausting just laying that out there. Dog. Bone. Dog. Bone. And the deeper I looked, the more questions I had. The Superintendent Salary QuestionWhen Morales was appointed County Superintendent in 2021, his salary reportedly increased roughly $35,000 above that of his predecessor, landing around $280,000 base salary to start. Since then, the board approved additional raises that ultimately brought his base salary to approximately $315,000 plus benefits. This is a $70,000 increase in base pay alone between 2021 and now. That alone does not prove wrongdoing. I mean, the board did approve these salary increases. But concerns certainly have emerged around how those salaries were benchmarked and justified. At the center of those discussions was salary comparison data presented to the board by Deputy Superintendent of Fiscal Services Misty Key — Morales’ now-fiancée. That dynamic alone raises reasonable questions. The individual responsible for preparing compensation comparison data for the board also has her own compensation package determined by the superintendent whose salary she is helping benchmark. That is, at minimum, a governance structure that deserves serious scrutiny. The “Similar Size and Scope” Issue In reviewing previous board discussions, something jumped out at me. In 2019, during then-Superintendent Stan Mantooth’s salary review, trustees explicitly stated they preferred using median salary comparisons — not averages — because averages could be skewed by outliers, creating a large range. Board discussion at the time specifically referenced comparing Ventura County to Class II and III county offices of education that were most similar in:
And at that time, it was Misty Key who very confidently reported that the list presented was the exact and best list that most closely represented Ventura County comparables. She spoke at length to it during that meeting. At that time, Mantooth's superintendent salary landed almost exactly at the peer median based on this board discussion, raised from $240k to $246k. But by 2021, when Dr. Morales' salary is being discussed after his recent appointment to the position, the methodology appears to have shifted substantially. Larger counties — including Los Angeles, San Diego and others — were added into the comparison pool under the label of “similar size and scope,” even those these Class I (Ventura County is Class III) counties are by no reasonable explanation, "comparable." In 2019, Key specifically stated that LA was in class all of its own due to its size ... and now, she's presenting it as a "comparable" county? Huh? Plus, that ain't all ...
As covered, this matters because including massive counties naturally inflates the comparison average. It's exactly why the board said they didn't want to use the "average" benchmark when decision-making. IT SKEWS THE DATA UP. When the peer analysis is limited to counties more comparable in operational scale (as was used in 2019 list), the compensation picture changes dramatically. Now, when it came time for Dr. Morales' salary discussion ... the data provided, as mentioned above, was comprised based on a larger pool of of counties, and only showed the board the "average", not the "median." In listening to the audio recording, I'm inclined to believe that then-Trustee Mark Lisagor, played a significant role in coordination with Misty Key, on how this data was presented — not only during this salary review, but in subsequent years. Anyway, that data showed that the "average" was: $281,519. Dr. Morales was brought in at $280,000. HOWEVER, when the appropriate, comparable list (as was identified in 2019) is used for this salary discussion, the average becomes $272,314. And the MEDIAN, which wasn’t even included, is $262,042. (That's about a $19,000 difference!) Even after accounting for cost-of-living differences, analysis suggests Morales’ prior salary was already aligned with — or above — peer market median rates before subsequent raises were approved. Again, this does not automatically prove intentional manipulation. But it absolutely raises questions about how the methodology changed, and the lack of transparency around those changes. Not to mention an acknowledgement of an "incentive structure" when you consider the compensation dynamic between the superintendent and deputy superintendent of fiscal services (even before you add in the relationship!)
The Executive Compensation StructureConcerns shared did not stop at the superintendent salary itself. Multiple individuals brought up the top-heavy executive structure at VCOE. Publicly available data suggests:
Analysis comparing executive cost per student suggests VCOE may carry significantly higher leadership costs relative to larger neighboring offices of ed, including San Diego County Office of Education and Los Angeles County Office of Education. The key issue raised repeatedly was this: Why is Ventura County paying big-county executive prices across a mid-size system? That question becomes more pressing when VCOE leadership simultaneously cites:
The OPEB and Reserve Fund QuestionsBeyond executive compensation and governance concerns, another issue repeatedly raised in conversations — and one that deserves far more public explanation — involves VCOE’s reserve structures and OPEB funding activity. For those unfamiliar, OPEB stands for “Other Post-Employment Benefits,” primarily retiree health care obligations. Public agencies often establish dedicated reserve or trust funds to prefund these long-term liabilities. Having an OPEB structure itself is not unusual. In fact, it’s common. What raises questions is how these funds are being presented, utilized and discussed in the broader context of VCOE’s financial narrative. In reviewing interim financial reports, reserve fund discussions and budget documents, several inconsistencies stood out. VCOE maintains:
The presentation of the data is difficult for the public — and frankly, sometimes even board members — to follow clearly. Specific to the OPEB ... it's seen a significant shift since 2021, with $1 and $2 million transfers into the fund ... with no liabilities or expenditures against it. It's now got approx. $10 mill in this fund ... for what purpose? There are, I'm told, only 17 remaining grandfathered-in employees with lifetime benefits. No one can explain the way this fund is being used ... outside of questions if it's connected to rumors that Dr. Morales has given himself, and select executives, lifetime benefits and are parking funds here for that purpose. Then, when you combine this all with:
it raises entirely reasonable questions about how VCOE is portraying its financial condition to both the board and the public. Don't forget that this is happening while discussions have occurred regarding workforce reductions, classroom closures, elimination of positions, special education concerns, and repeated messaging about financial pressure. If substantial reserve capacity and one-time flexibility exist, I think it's fair that taxpayers and employees naturally want to understand the purpose of this OPEB fund, and related funds, better. Several individuals with education finance experience also raised concerns that VCOE’s budget presentations can be difficult to compare year-over-year because categories, presentation structures and reporting formats appear to shift in ways that make trends harder to track consistently. Again, I am not alleging that the existence of these reserve structures is improper. Rather, the concern is whether or not:
Retaliation, Culture and Institutional FearAs more individuals reached out, another pattern emerged repeatedly: fear of retaliation. People described a workplace culture they characterized as retaliatory and heavily driven by loyalty ("yes people"). Multiple current and former employees described Morales as vindictive toward individuals who challenged him or disagreed with executive leadership decisions. Others described concerns about long-time employees leaving, institutional knowledge disappearing and departments being gutted or restructured under Morales’ administration. I've had numerous folks reach out sharing stories about being coerced into signing "exit" agreements with NDAs in order to receive small exit compensation packages. Of course they have all signed. You need the money when your longtime job is being yanked out from underneath you. Others raised concerns about:
And then there’s the branding issue. Morales’ name reportedly appears across an extraordinary amount of VCOE swag, signage, communications and social media promotion. Multiple educators independently described VCOE communications as feeling more centered around promoting Dr. Morales personally than promoting the institution itself. Collectively, these concerns paint a picture many described as deeply uncomfortable. Statement from LVUSD Trustee Angela Cutbill I was disappointed not to be able to ask my questions at last night’s forum. Both of them would have been directed to the current VCOE Superintendent (Dr. César Morales): Why This MattersThis is not about gossip. It is not about politics. And it is not about doing “dirty work” for political opponents. County offices of education exist to serve students, districts and families — especially vulnerable student populations including foster youth, unhoused students, migrant students and special education students. These institutions oversee enormous public resources and wield significant influence across educational systems. We deserve transparency, accountability and strong governance. That is how public trust is built and maintained. And when patterns of concerns repeatedly intersect across:
it is entirely reasonable for the public to ask questions! Whether these concerns ultimately reveal misconduct, poor governance, weak oversight or simply a culture too insulated from accountability (or, cough all of the above), Ventura County taxpayers deserve clear answers and independent review. Families whose students rely on these services through the Office of Ed deserve honesty. So do the hardworking educators and staff. I recognize some people will dismiss this entirely. Others will insist none of it matters unless every allegation can be fully proven immediately. Been there, yawn. I won't ignore these patterns just because they might be inconvenient for an agenda. What Happens NextThe matter has now formally moved into the hands of legal counsel.
Following outreach to the VCOE Board of Education regarding concerns surrounding executive compensation, alleged undisclosed one-time payments, governance structure and broader transparency issues, both the board and Dr. Morales have retained separate legal counsel. The matter has since been discussed in closed session due to potential legal exposure and liability concerns. An update is expected at the next VCOE Board Meeting, currently scheduled for May 26, 2026. In the meantime, I still await a response to my PRA requesting:
The 14-day extension period ends on May 19. The fact that these concerns escalated quickly into closed-session legal discussions underscores the seriousness of the issues being raised. This is where transparency matters most. The public deserves:
If the allegations surrounding undisclosed compensation and governance failures are unfounded, the release of records and a transparent public explanation should help put many of these concerns to rest. If they are substantiated, then the public deserves accountability. And with ballots already in voters’ hands, timing matters. Sources
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Anonymous MommyArchives
May 2026
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed
